← back to list

Got paid to fix a client's ads. turns out the ads werent the problem

★★★ signal-strong   r/ppc  ·  ↑ 87  ·  💬 32  ·  2026-02-20  ·  kw: better way to  ·  open on reddit ↗
your rating:
Tool
none
Issue
Landing page with 15-form fields causing 4.75x higher CPL (€19) than quiz-based alternative (€4) in insurance lead gen, despite well-performing ads; form friction on mobile reduces conversion despite identical data collection.
Cost
€19 CPL vs €4 CPL = 4.75x improvement; creative optimization only yielded 1.14x improvement, indicating landing page was primary bottleneck
Recommendation
Replace multi-field forms with progressive quiz/multi-step experience using progress bars to reduce perceived friction; none (consensus community validation, not tool-specific)
Date context
2026-02-20; mentions Andromeda algorithm and broad targeting without interest segmentation as current best practice
extracted with
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 · 2026-05-08

Body

changed a landing page and CPL dropped from €19 to €4. didnt touch the ads. this is gonna annoy some people but whatever had a client in insurance lead gen. CPL was sitting at around $25 and honestly the ads werent even that bad. like they were fine. not amazing but fine. everyone I talked to kept saying test new creatives, kill the bad ad sets, try different audiences. the usual stuff you read everywhere but idk something felt off so instead of touching the ads I just went and looked at the actual page people were landing on bro. it was a form with like 15 fields. name address phone email date of birth current provider coverage type budget range and probably some other stuff I'm forgetting. it literally looked like you were applying for a mortgage. I remember sitting there thinking who the hell would fill this out from a facebook ad on their phone while watching tv so I went and checked what competitors were doing. every single one that was clearly spending hard (you know the ones, ads running for months) was using some type of quiz. not a form. a quiz. "find out if you qualify" or "see your options in 60 seconds" type thing told the client look just scrap the form and build a quiz. same questions basically but broken into steps with a progress bar. sounds like a small change right? its not. filling out a 15 field form feels like doing your taxes. clicking through a quiz feels like youre getting somewhere. completely different energy even tho you're collecting the same info CPL went from €19 to €4. I didnt change a single ad. same campaigns same audiences same budget same everything. just the page THEN we went and did the creative work. went from like 3 generic ads to 15-20 totally different angles in the CBO. fear of not having coverage, social proof, direct price comparison, storytelling. actual different approaches not just the same thing with a blue background instead of white lol that brought us from $4 to $3.50. which is great but like... lets do the math here. the landing page was a 4.7x improvement. the creative overhaul was 1.14x. I spent way more time on the creative stuff than on the landing page recommendation tbh and thats kind of my point with this post. I lurk here a lot and I see so many threads about ad copy and headlines and hook rates and yeah all of that matters. but if your page converts at like 2% because it looks like homework none of that stuff is gonna save you nobody wants to "submit an application." everybody wants to "see their results." its the same thing but one converts and the other one doesnt. idk why more people dont talk about this edit: forgot to mention we run full broad now btw. no interest targeting at all. pixel is warmed up and with andromeda the algo honestly finds better people than I ever could manually. but you need to give it creative volume to work with. 3 ads in a campaign is not enough for broad to do its thing

Top comments (7)

[score=44] [deleted]
[removed]
[score=25] QuantumWolf99
This is painfullyyyy accurate and honestly the landing page being the bottleneck happens way more often than anyone wants to admit... creative gets all the attention because it's visible but conversion rate optimization is where the actual leverage lives. Form-to-quiz shift working so well makes complete sense... 15 fields on mobile from a cold Facebook ad is asking someone to commit before they even know what they're getting. Breaking it into progressive steps with a progress bar gamifies the experience and reduces perceived friction even though you're collecting identical data. For lead gen clients I manage in insurance and finance verticals this exact pattern shows up constantly... accounts spending $150k+ monthly where we'll test 50 creative variations and move CPL by 10-15% but then restructure the landing page funnel and CPL drops 40-60% overnight because the ads were never the problem. Creative volume point at the end is underrated too IMO... running broad targeting with only 3 ads is just starving the algorithm of signal. Meta needs 15-20+ creative variations rotating through to actually find patterns and optimize delivery properly otherwise it's just guessing with limited data and performance stays mediocre regardless of how much budget you throw at it.
[score=7] mdmppc
Yeah I can say that 15 field is most likely older process to weed out spam or window shoppers, thought now its pointless since spam is song ai to fill those out at same speed. Quiz idea is good to break up longer forms while still getting all of the information. Probably only work for certain industries though. Other factors are sales team cant sell the service so doesnt matter how many leads come through. But yes most times not ads themselves (though seen some bad setups), ive had solid ads numbers, analytics shows solid interaction and engagement but still minimal leads, mainly site not selling that last step or answering the question they have, usually a bottleneck somewher.
[score=3] ppcwithyrv
Most conversion problems are the post click conversion problem. Ads are fairly straight forward now......just maki sure your conversion tracking is set.
[score=3] JehbUK
I am experiencing this more and more tbh. As the ppc world becomes more automated, more AI driven I think it’ll be less about the ads and more about the user experience after.
[score=2] Popular-Cap-9013
Yes, you right. I didn't really thought about it but yesterday I was doing some funnel hacking how was checking a really good competitor and there website looks like it's a saas they really done an amazing job there is some data and api used to give an experience and it gets me.
[score=2] harisenbon
15 fields to 5 fields is a bigger lever than any audience tweak. People blame the ad because that's what the dashboard shows them, but the ad's job is just to get the click. Everything after that is a different problem entirely.