← back to list

I've seen hundreds of pitch decks this year and here is my learnings:

★★ signal-medium   r/entrepreneur  ·  ↑ 251  ·  💬 93  ·  2025-12-29  ·  kw: campaign automation  ·  open on reddit ↗
your rating:
Tool
none
Issue
Founders struggle to communicate pitch deck clarity; investors waste time decoding poorly structured problem statements, vague traction metrics (e.g. '10K users' without MoM growth or ARPU context), and unfocused market sizing that lacks founder-specific logic, causing deal rejection or misalignment.
Cost
unstated
Recommendation
none
Date context
Q1 2025 (AI-as-feature noise inflection point); early 2026 context (distribution over product emphasis shift)
extracted with
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 · 2026-05-08

Body

I've seen hundreds of pitch decks, met dozens of founders in 2025, and made dozens of pitch decks. Talked to many investors and asked their insights about pitch decks for whole year. Here is what I learned this year: 1. **The problem slide is where you win or lose.** If an investor doesn't lean forward on slide 2, the rest doesn't matter. Most founders bury their best insight on slide 8. 2. **Founders who've experienced the problem they're solving tell better stories.** Personal connection > market research every single time. 3. **The "platform" word is poison.** I removed it from at least 10 decks this year. Just tell me what the thing actually does. 4. **Traction without context is useless.** "10K users" means nothing. "10K users, 23% MoM growth, $47 average revenue per user" means something. 5. **Most market size slides are bullshit, and investors know it.** TAM/SAM/SOM with numbers pulled from Statista doesn't impress anyone. Show me YOUR math based on YOUR customer segments. 6. **Financial projections are fiction, but they reveal how you think.** Show you understand unit economics and investors will forgive aggressive growth assumptions. Show hockey sticks with no underlying logic and investors will assume you don't know your business. 7. **The team slide should answer "why you, why now."** Your advisor's LinkedIn profile doesn't matter. Your 10 years solving this exact problem does. 8. **Asking for money without showing what milestones is just amateur.** "We need $2M for hiring and marketing" isn't a plan. "$2M gets us to $100K MRR and 18-month runway" is. 9. **Design matters less than founders think, but more than they act like it does.** Your deck doesn't need to be gorgeous, but it can't look like you don't give a shit. 10. **Every deck should answer: what's the insight only you have?** If I could've thought of your idea without domain expertise, it's not compelling enough. 11. **Slide count doesn't matter.** Based on my experience and Carta's insights, there's no correlation between slide number and fundraising success. If a slide is meaningful, keep it. If a slide is just "nice to have," remove it. 12. **Founders confuse features with benefits.** "AI-powered matching algorithm" doesn't mean shit to anyone. "Cuts hiring time from 60 days to 12" does. 13. **The fundraising story matters as much as the business story.** Why this round, why this amount, why now etc. If you can't articulate it clearly, investors smell desperation. 14. **The decks that got funded weren't perfect but they were clear.** Clarity beats cleverness every single time. 15. **Nobody reads Slide 1 (Cover slide).** They glance at it for 3 seconds. If your tagline is a paragraph, you've already lost. 16. **"AI" is a feature, not a business.** In Q1 2025, slapping "AI" on a slide worked. Now? It's noise. Tell me what problem you solve, not what tech stack you use. 17. **The "Conservative Estimate" Lie.** We know your Year 5 projection of $100M ARR is fake. You know it's fake. Focus on how you get the first $1M instead of giving huge promises. 18. **One idea per slide.** I see founders trying to cram the Problem, Solution, and Market Size onto one slide to "save space." Don't. It looks like a random note. 19. **Your TAM is wrong.** If you claim your Total Addressable Market is "The Global Internet," you don't know who your customer is. Niche down. 20. **Font size 10 is illegal.** If an investor has to squint to read your LTV/CAC ratio on a mobile screen, they're closing the file. 21. **Bullet points are boring.** Use icons, use charts, use big numbers. Walls of text are for legal contracts, not pitch decks. 22. **Stop using "Uber for X."** It's almost 2026. Come up with your own category. 23. **The Appendix is your best friend.** Keep the main deck short and tell your story clearly. Put the technical deep dives in the appendix. 24. **PDF is the only format.** Don't send a Keynote. Don't send a PPT. Fonts break. Layouts shift. Send a PDF. 25. **Your "Exit Strategy" is presumptuous.** You haven't sold one unit yet. Don't tell me about your IPO plans. 26. **Data needs context.** Don't just show a graph going up. Label the axes. Explain the spike. Everybody love labeled axes. 27. **Consistency signals competence.** If your headers jump around and your colors shift slightly, investors subconsciously think your code is messy too. 28. **Frameworks kill the story.** Most founders try to use famous frameworks. But those frameworks push founders to be standard. Instead of this, create your own story. 29. **Competition slide is your positioning.** Everybody knows you cannot compete with Google, Apple, OpenAI or other big corporates. But you really can focus a niche and grow in a vertical. You don't have to write a complex competition slide. X-Y landscape is great but you have to choose the right X and Y angles and be perfect on your niche. 30. **Don't separate "Why Now" into its own slide.** Weave it naturally into your problem (it's urgent), market (it's shifting), and competition (giants are slow). When "why now" is isolated, it feels forced. **My predictions for 2026:** **AI will review your deck before humans do.** I've talked to investors and many of them are already using AI reviews, custom GPTs, Claude, Gemini on their emails. Your pitch deck isn't just for humans anymore. You need to explain your business to AI too. Find the balance: clear enough for AI to understand, compelling enough for humans to care. **Pre-seed rounds will get harder.** Building an MVP is easier than ever thanks to AI. So investors are asking for revenue or real traction even at pre-seed, and their bar will keep rising. My advice? Generate traction first, fundraise later -when it is possible of course. (And possible doesn't mean "if you have money", it means "if it is possible as technical") **Investor outreach will be noisier than ever.** Automation tools are everywhere now. Anyone can build a bulk email campaign to investors. Standing out will require actual creativity, not just another cold email template. The spray-and-pray approach is literally dead.

Top comments (8)

[score=1] AutoModerator
Welcome to /r/Entrepreneur and thank you for the post, /u/duygudulger! Please make sure you read our [community rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/Entrepreneur/about/rules/) before participating here. As a quick refresher: * Promotion of products and services is not allowed here. This includes dropping URLs, asking users to DM you, check your profile, job-seeking, and investor-seeking. *Unsanctioned promotion of any kind will lead to a permanent ban for all of your accounts.* * AI and GPT-generated posts and comments are unprofessional, and will be treated as spam, including a permanent ban for that account. * If you have free offerings, please comment in our weekly Thursday stickied thread. * If you need feedback, please comment in our weekly Friday stickied thread. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Entrepreneur) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[score=58] ItsCreedBratton1
As an investor and mentor, Pitch decks are the biggest waste of time and we need to move on from them and start adopting 1-2 page investment thesis reports. The time spent pouring over font sizes, graphics, images, charts, and slides that need to be adjusted for each investor puts the founders at a disadvantage. Rather, a well written and thoughtful Investment thesis report that outlines a clear problem, solution, thesis, data points, team, and ask. Why waste hours on making something "look good". If an investor is impressed by color schemes, graphics, and imagery, then there is a fundamental problem. I am impressed when you can articulate in 2 pages what you plan on doing because it's more focused and you don't have the leeway for fluff.
[score=11] Quick_Breakfast_7684
Number 16 hits different - went from "we're an AI company" to "we use AI to solve X problem" real quick this year The PDF thing is so true too, can't tell you how many decks I've seen that look completely broken because someone sent a Keynote file
[score=9] dartanyanyuzbashev
Good list overall, the strongest point is clarity over cleverness, most decks fail because they talk like founders not buyers or investors, problem slide plus concrete benefit beats any fancy AI or platform story, also agree that traction with context matters way more than raw numbers, one thing I would add is decks should be readable in 3 minutes because that is how they are actually consumed
[score=7] Big_Dealer_
I’d add one more: If your deck only makes sense when you’re in the room explaining it, it’s not a pitch deck, it’s speaker notes.
[score=7] AlonHuri
Great list. As a VC, there are 3 critical slides that are either missing or weak in almost every deck I see right now. 1. The "Why Now" (Beyond just "AI") Every single deck in 2025 says "Why Now? -> Because GenAI made it possible." While true, it is no longer a differentiator. It’s table stakes. I see 50 decks a week claiming this. To stand out, you need a second-order "Why Now." Is there a regulatory shift? A generational behavior change? A collapse of a legacy incumbent's business model? If your only catalyst is "LLMs exist," you are competing with everyone. 2. Distribution > Product Most founders spend 10 slides on the product and 1 generic slide saying "We will do SEO and Ads." In 2026, building product is easy (thanks to AI). Distribution is the hard part. I don't care how pretty the UI is; show me you understand how to acquire a customer for $1 before you extract $3. 3. "Pain Validation" with Real Data Don't just tell me the market is big. Prove the pain is acute. Market research reports are nice, but your own data is king. Show me the results of 50 customer interviews. Better yet show me a "Fake Door" test where you ran $100 of ads to a landing page describing the problem. Did they click? Did they try to sign up? "We think people want this" < "We have a 3% CTR on cold traffic targeting this specific pain point."
[score=3] signalpath_mapper
This lines up with what I’ve seen from the operator side when founders pitch internally too. Clarity beats ambition every time, especially when teams are already stretched. The decks that actually helped execution were the ones that made priorities obvious and cut the fluff. When someone can’t explain how they get to the first real milestone, everything downstream gets messy fast. The AI point is interesting too, we already feel that pressure writing things so systems and reviewers don’t misinterpret them.
[score=3] startup_chemist
Personal experience here. \#2 If you have lived a problem, or have someone in your founding team that has lived the problem - you already have an 'unfair advantage'. Which is big given you're only a startup.